Print ISSN:-2454-4396
Online ISSN:-2393-8005
CODEN : JETHB8
Original Article
Author Details :
Volume : 4, Issue : 3, Year : 2017
Article Page : 93-96
Abstract
Lecture though is effective method of teaching, it is considered as a passive means in imparting knowledge. It’s time to change this means with innovative methods like small group teaching, etc.
The study was carried out with first year 140 MBBS students. These students were randomly selected and were divided in to two groups of A and B of strength seventy in each group. Lipid chemistry and metabolism was the topic selected. Pre-test for A and B group by multiple choice questions was conducted. Group B was further divided into ten sub groups, and these students were provided with specific learning objectives for the topic and after a week they were taught the topic in the form of small group discussion sessions over a period of 4 weeks. The facilitators ensured that all the group B participants were involved in the discussion. The group A remained as a whole group and underwent the didactic lecture method. Later, post test was conducted with the same MCQs. To evaluate the students perception towards the SGD for group B, we administered a qualitative questionnaire.
There was a significant improvement with post SGD group, when compared with post Lecture group. The perception of students was positive regarding small group teaching.
Introduction of small group teaching as a learning tool was appreciated by the students and led to a significant improvement in the student’s performance.
Keywords: SGD-small group discussions, DL-didactic lectures, MCQs- multiple choice questions.
How to cite : Padugupati S, Joshi K, Yamini D, Chary R S, Sarma D, Educational outcomes of small group discussion versus traditional lecture among first year undergraduate medical students. J Educ Technol Health Sci 2017;4(3):93-96
This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to remix, and build upon the work, the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.