• Article highlight
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 17-09-2024

Accepted : 20-11-2024



Article Metrics




Downlaod Files

   


Article Access statistics

Viewed: 151

PDF Downloaded: 97


Get Permission Krishnasamy, Alagu, Mohan, Qian, Elanthevan, Jusoh, Sadikan, and Hairi: The relationship between sleep quality and happiness among preclinical students in a medical school


Introduction

Sleep quality holds an extremely significant role for everyone in their daily life.1 Sleep is a basic need for a human being to continue daily activities effectively.2 The lack of awareness of the importance of sleep is very detrimental to one’s health and can lead to long-term side effects and undesirable consequences.3 Sleep is foundational to supporting robust and healthy physical and mental health, with its effects being particularly pronounced in critical environments like medical school. A review of the literature reveals that poor sleep quality is very common among medical students, owing to academic pressures and irregular schedules, and is related to poor cognitive performance and negative emotional well-being.4 This is important because poor quality sleep is associated with higher stress, depressive symptoms, and cognitive decline, all of which can affect students' ability to do well in school and life.5

Recent research reveals concerning rates of sleep problems experienced by (medical) students all over the world, with nearly half of students reporting poor sleep quality.6 In a study with Mediterranean medical and nursing students, a great number of them reported a suboptimal sleep quality, where factors such as academic pressure, the usage of smartphones and high mental stress were responsible for such a high suboptimal sleep quality.7 Medical students regularly have disrupted sleep and shorter sleep duration, tightly linked to depressive symptoms, irritability, and poor academic performance.8 In addition, medical students with inadequate sleep have shown a greater risk for anxiety and depressive symptoms evidence should intervene. The results of a study examining the effects of COVID-19 on Iranian medical students found that those who scored lowest for sleep quality were also reporting the highest levels of depression, indicating that poor sleep could enhance the risk for mental health problems.9

The established goal of this study was to evaluate sleep quality and happiness levels and the correlation between sleep and happiness among preclinical students at Manipal University College Malaysia (MUCM). The study hopes to inform future wellness initiatives using these relationships that help students achieve both academic achievement and maintain their mental health.

Materials and Methods

Study design and sampling method

A cross-sectional design was used to study the relationship between sleep quality and happiness among preclinical students at MUCM, Melaka, Malaysia. Participant selection was done using a simple random sampling method from the population to achieve representation and minimize selection bias.

Ethical approval

Before data collection, ethical approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 071/2022) at MUCM to safeguard the rights, safety, dignity, and well-being of the research participants. Consent forms were also provided to participants along with the questionnaire.

Questionnaire

An online questionnaire was structured which consisted of three sections; section A regarding the demographic data, section B about the sleep quality assessment, and section C that evaluates the happiness of students. The questionnaires were validated (by three lecturers from the faculty) and pre-tested (answered by foundation students) before being sent out to the participants. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Oxford Happiness Questionnaire (OHQ) were used as references for this research. This content validity was established to ensure the questionnaire items cover all relevant aspects of the constructs being measured.

These PSQI and OHQ questionnaires are standard and widely used to assess the quality of sleep and happiness. PSQI can be used as an efficient tool to measure the quality of sleep by assessing subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, sleeping medication and daytime dysfunction.10, 11 Each of the sleep components yields a score ranging from 0 to 3 with 3 indicating the greatest dysfunction. OHQ contains 29 questions. Each question consists of four choices, depicting the amount of happiness as unhappy, mildly depressed, low level of happiness and high level of happiness.

Sample size calculation

The sample size can be calculated by using the formula developed by Krejcie and Morgan. 12 The total number of preclinical medical and dental students, N is incorporated into the formula below to find out the required sample size for this research:

S=X2 NP(1 - P)d2(N - 1)+ X2 P(1 - P)

Where: S is the required sample size, X2 is the chi-square value based on the desired confidence level, 𝑃 is the estimated proportion of the population, 𝑑 is the margin of error. This formula accounts for both population size and the variability within the population, allowing for the determination of an adequate sample size that represents the larger group accurately.

Method of study

Data were analysed using Microsoft Excel and SPSS. Sleep quality components were then used as predictor variables and happiness score was used as a dependent variable to evaluate the association between sleep quality and happiness scores using multiple linear regression. This approach facilitated examining the impact strength and significance of the effect of each sleep quality component on happiness while controlling other variables in the model.

Results

Demographic data

For this research project, a sample size of 305 participants was obtained. Based on the sample size, the percentage of female participants outweighs the male participants with 66.6% female participants and 33.4% male participants. The largest percentage of participants in this research, 41%, were first-year MBBS students, followed by first-year BDS students, second-year MBBS and second-year BDS students in MUCM. As for nationality, the participants comprised 76.7% Malaysians and 23.3% Non-Malaysians.

Sleep latency

Sleep latency is the amount of time taken for an individual to fall asleep after turning the lights out.13 The analysis of this research project presents that 25.9% of participants have a sleep latency score of 0 hours which shows the vast majority of participants can fall asleep between 30 to 45 minutes after lights have been turned out while 6.2% of participants have sleep latency scores of 5 and 6 hours. This indicates a minor percentage of participants require 5 and 6 hours to be able to fall asleep after the lights have been turned out.(Table 1)

Table 1

Percentage of sleep latency among preclinical students at MUCM (n = 305)

Sleep latency

Frequency

Percentage

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

0

79

25.9

25.9

25.9

1-2

61

20.0

20.0

45.9

3-4

50

16.4

16.4

62.3

5-6

56

18.4

18.4

80.7

4

21

6.9

6.9

87.5

5

19

6.2

6.2

93.8

6

19

6.2

6.2

100.0

Total

305

100.0

100.0

Subjective sleep quality

Subjective sleep quality refers to the overall quality of sleep acquired by participants. Based on data analysis, it indicates that 55.4% of participants have fairly good sleep quality whereas 6.9% of participants have very bad sleep quality. This outcome is a result of students frequently using electronic devices for study purposes, which serves as an easy distraction and makes it more difficult to get a good night's sleep.(Table 2)

Table 2

Percentage of subjective sleep quality among preclinical students at MUCM (n = 305)

Subjective sleep quality

Frequency

Percentage

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

Very good

38

12.5

12.5

12.5

Fairly good

169

55.4

55.4

67.9

Fairly bad

77

25.2

25.2

93.1

Very bad

21

6.9

6.9

100.0

Total

305

100.0

100.0

Sleep duration

In terms of sleep duration, 43.3% of participants obtained 6-7 hours of sleep followed by 32.5% obtaining 5-6 hours, 15.7% obtaining less than 5 hours of sleep and lastly 8.5% of participants obtained more than 7 hours of sleep. This is due to the extensive study hours required to revise for classes and tests as a medical student, which results in students getting less sleep each day.(Table 3)

Table 3

Percentage of sleep duration among preclinical students at MUCM (n = 305)

Sleep duration

Frequency

Percentage

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

> 7 hours

26

8.5

8.5

8.5

6-7 hours

132

43.3

43.3

51.8

5-6 hours

99

32.5

32.5

84.3

< 5 hours

48

15.7

15.7

100.0

Total

305

100.0

100.0

Habitual sleep efficiency

Habitual sleep efficiency is the ratio between the time a person spends asleep and the total time dedicated to sleep. 81.3% of participants have a habitual sleep efficiency of more than 85%. This result of more than 85% habitual sleep efficiency shows that the majority of preclinical students at MUCM prioritize sleep and realize that a good night's sleep and having slept well are essential for maximizing learning during classes. Results also indicate a minor percentage which is 3% of participants have habitual sleep efficiency of less than 65%. (Table 4)

Table 4

Percentage of habitual sleep efficiency among preclinical students at MUCM (n = 305)

Habitual sleep efficiency

Frequency

Percentage

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

> 85%

248

81.3

81.3

81.3

75-84%

34

11.1

11.1

92.5

65-74%

14

4.6

4.6

97.0

< 65%

9

3.0

3.0

100.0

Total

305

100.0

100.0

The formula used to calculate Habitual Sleep Efficiency:

Number of hours sleptNumber of hours spent in bed ×100

Sleep disturbances

Based on the participants of this research project, 9.2% of them have 0 sleep disturbances while 66.6% of participants have 1-9 sleep disturbances. Participants are asked if they have experienced specific issues during the past month, such as waking up in the middle of the night or early morning, having to use the bathroom during the night, feeling too hot or too cold, having bad dreams, and other disruptions. The frequency of these disturbances is rated on a scale from 0 (not during the past month) to 3 (three or more times a week). A higher score in this component indicates more frequent sleep disturbances during the past month (the maximum score for 9 factors of disturbance is 27). Upon further questioning, students who do experience sleep disturbance did mention the cause is due to their hectic schedule which affects their sleep quality. The data shows bad weather and nightmares are the most common factors which are affecting students' sleep among the participants of MUCM. (Table 5)

Table 5

Percentage of sleep disturbance among preclinical students at MUCM (n = 305)

Sleep disturbance

Frequency

Percentage

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid

0

28

9.2

9.2

9.2

1-9

203

66.6

66.6

75.7

10-18

67

22.0

22.0

97.7

19-27

7

2.3

2.3

100.0

Total

305

100.0

100.0

Sleeping medication

Sleeping medication was not taken during the past month by 97.4% of participants which indicates that a large percentage of participants do not depend on sleeping medication to acquire good sleep whereas 1% of participants take sleeping medication less than once a week. Medical students are often vulnerable to stress and anxiety which can cause sleeping problems and burnout which leads to the usage of sleeping pills to aid sleep for a minor percentage of medical students.(Table 6)

Table 6

Percentage of sleeping medication among preclinical students at MUCM (n = 305)

Sleeping medication

Frequency

Percentage

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Not during the past month

297

97.4

97.4

97.4

Less than once a week

3

1.0

1.0

98.4

Once/ twice a week

2

.7

.7

99.0

3 or more times a week

3

1.0

1.0

100.0

Total

305

100.0

100.0

Daytime dysfunction

Data obtained for this research indicates that 42% of participants have only a very slight problem whereas 12.1% of participants face a very big problem when it comes to daytime dysfunction. Students are having trouble getting things done during the day due to lack of sleep which directly impacts their performance the next day. (Table 7)

Table 7

Percentage of daytime dysfunction among preclinical students at MUCM (n = 305)

Daytime dysfunction

Frequency

Percentage

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

No problem et all

54

17.7

17.7

17.7

Only a very slight problem

128

42.0

42.0

59.7

Somewhat of a problem

86

28.2

28.2

87.9

A very big problem

37

12.1

12.1

100.0

Total

305

100.0

100.0

Table 8

Relationship between happiness (constant) and subscales on sleep quality among preclinical students at MUCM (n = 305)

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t

Sig.

B

Std. Error

Beta

Happiness

4.273

.110

38.830

.000

Subjective sleep quality

-.171

.060

-.183

-2.851

.005

Sleep latency

-.029

.025

-.073

-1.159

.247

Sleep duration

.071

.051

.085

1.403

.162

Sleep efficiency

-.050

.061

-.048

-.819

.413

Sleep disturbance

.039

.072

.033

.536

.592

Use of sleep medication

-.105

.112

-.052

-.939

.349

Daytime dysfunction

-.184

.048

-.234

-3.859

.000

Happiness score

There are 29 questions for evaluating the happiness score. Based on the happiness score results, 53% of participants are just moderately happy. Following 27% of participants are not particularly happy. 19% of participants are pretty happy. 2% are somewhat happy. Hence, the happiness score of the majority of preclinical students of MUCM is just moderate.

Factors for happiness

For this section students were allowed to choose multiple options which are social activities, money, friends, food & family. Based on the results, the majority of participants, 80.7% of participants chose the family as an option out of food, friends, money & social activity. The results indicate that preclinical students at MUCM prioritize their families to a greater extent. Hence, family plays a vital role in the happiness of preclinical students of MUCM.

Multiple linear regression on happiness and subscales on sleep quality

Based on the multiple linear regression, the p-value for subjective sleep quality is 0.005 and the p-value for daytime dysfunction is less than 0.001. Subjective sleep quality score and daytime dysfunction score were significant predictors of happiness levels.

Discussion

Their PSQI scores show that the majority of students experience sleep disturbances less than once a week. Even these low-frequency disturbances can have profound impacts on academic and personal well-being. Studies point out that medical students can have many lifestyle factors that can contribute to sleep problems including long stretching studying hours, academic stress, screen time, and sleep disorders such as sleep apnoea, however that academic demands combined with long stretches of studying late at night and pre-sleep anxiety can exacerbate sleep issues further, creating a cycle of anxiety and insufficient sleep leading to poor health and academic results.14 Medical students remain “submerged in studies” based on their findings of longer study times, studying just before sleep, and associated anxiety about their studies and results.15 The study among medical students in Pakistan shows that poor quality of sleep is linked with poorer academic performance, cognitive difficulties and poorer memory retention, a crucial skill for medical education.16 This lifestyle pattern can create a vicious cycle, where anxiety and inadequate sleep hinder academic performance, and poor grades, in turn, increase stress and disrupt sleep even more. In contrast, adequate sleep has a crucial role in enhancing cognitive skills especially memory retention.16

Sleep quality affects emotional well-being and happiness, in addition to performance. MUCM preclinical students conveyed moderate happiness scores, which correspond to findings by Jiang et al.17 that university students are typically not happy. Sleep quality is strongly related to happiness, as measured by sleep quality and daytime functioning, and by how happy and how stable a person is in life. Research shows that students who get enough sleep, have a more positive view of life, are happier, and tend to be less stressed.18 Also, family support has an important role in students' happiness, controlling students' emotional stability and encouragement which makes students able to succeed academically when the problem time makes them sad or unable to study.19 Hence, these results highlight the important​ role of sleep quality promotion for medical students to promote academic success as well as mental health. Education and awareness on sleep habits and stress management, as well as screening for sleep disorders, might be helpful interventions that improve sleep quality and enable students to experience a more balanced and satisfying academic experience.20

Conclusion

Therefore, our research has concluded that sleep is associated with happiness. A suggestion for medical college management is to provide activity or counselling sessions for preclinical students of MUCM to increase life satisfaction and promote a healthy lifestyle to prevent sleep problems among the students. It will also help to educate preclinical students of MUCM regarding the importance of sleep quality and happiness.

Sources of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare none.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to express sincere gratitude to the Faculty of Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry and Research Management Centre (RMC) of MUCM for their invaluable support and assistance throughout this study.

References

1 

A Lenneis A Das-Friebel NK Tang AN Sanborn S Lemola H Singmann The influence of sleep on subjective well-being: An experience sampling studyEmotion202424245164

2 

H Merenheimo A study about students' sleeping habitsFinlandLapland University of Applied Sciences2018https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/152508/Thesis-%20Merenheimo.pdf

3 

D Ezzati NM Abbasi H Namdar N Khezerloo THN Abad A Shiri The Relationship between Sleep Quality and Happiness in Men with Coronary Artery DiseaseInt J Cardiovasc Pract2019441237

4 

MA Alsaggaf SO Wali RA Merdad LA Merdad Sleep quantity, quality, and insomnia symptoms of medical students during clinical years: relationship with stress and academic performanceSaudi Medl J201637217382

5 

AI Almojali SA Almalki AS Alothman EM Masuadi MK Alaqeel The prevalence and association of stress with sleep quality among medical studentsJ Epidemiol Glob Health20177316974

6 

MA Binjabr IS Alalawi RA Alzahrani OS Albalawi RH Hamzah YS Ibrahim The worldwide prevalence of sleep problems among medical students by problem, country, and COVID-19 status: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of 109 studies involving 59427 participantsCurr Sleep Med Rep20239316179

7 

F Bousgheiri A Allouch K Sammoud R Navarro-Martínez V Ibáñez-Del Valle M Senhaji Factors Affecting Sleep Quality among University Medical and Nursing Students: A Study in Two Countries in the Mediterranean RegionDiseases202412589

8 

JE Barahona-Correa JD Aristizabal-Mayor P Lasalvia ÁJ Ruiz P Hidalgo-Martínez Sleep disturbances, academic performance, depressive symptoms and substance use among medical students in Bogota, ColombiaSleep Sci20181142608

9 

A Shafiee J Fili S Ghafari MA Sattari N Borna A Pourramzani The prevalence of sleep disturbance and its possible associated factors among iranian medical students: A cross-sectional study with a national meta-analysisSleep Med X20247100107

10 

M Fabbri A Beracci M Martoni D Meneo L Tonetti V Natale Measuring subjective sleep quality: a reviewInt J Environ Res Public Health 20211831082

11 

SY Lee JE Choi JW Lee Y Lee JM Park KW Hong Testing the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index using fitbit devices: A cross-sectional analysisKorean J Fam Med202410.4082/kjfm.23.0166

12 

R Krejcie D Morgan Determınıng sample sıze for research actıvıtıesEduc Psychol Meas19703060710

13 

I Schöllhorn O Stefani RJ Lucas M Spitschan HC Slawik C Cajochen Melanopic irradiance defines the impact of evening display light on sleep latency, melatonin and alertnessCommun Biol202361228

14 

MC Azad K Fraser N Rumana AF Abdullah N Shahana PJ Hanly Sleep disturbances among medical students: a global perspectiveJ Clin Sleep Med20151116974

15 

E Preišegolavičiūtė D Leskauskas V Adomaitienė Associations of quality of sleep with lifestyle factors and profile of studies among Lithuanian studentsMedicina2010467482

16 

G Maheshwari F Shaukat Impact of poor sleep quality on the academic performance of medical studentsCureus2019114e4357

17 

Y Jiang C Lu J Chen Y Miao Y Li Q Deng Happiness in university students: Personal, familial, and social factors: A cross-sectional questionnaire surveyInt J Environ Res Public Health20221984713

18 

JE Shin JK Kim How a good sleep predicts life satisfaction: The role of zero-sum beliefs about happinessFront Psychol201891589

19 

D Grevenstein M Bluemke J Schweitzer C Aguilar-Raab Better family relationships--higher well-being: The connection between relationship quality and health related resourcesMent Health Prevention201914200160

20 

NS Redeker CC Caruso SD Hashmi JM Mullington M Grandner TI Morgenthaler Workplace interventions to promote sleep health and an alert, healthy workforceJ Clin Sleep Med201915464957



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to remix, and build upon the work, the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.